Skip to content

500px Releases Stock Photography Sales Functionality

The +500px Prime  stock photography sales functionality from +500px has been released.  Here's more detail on the new service from their FAQ:
"For licensed photos on 500px Prime, you are guaranteed 70% of the proceeds from every sale. Currently all photos on 500px Prime are $250 (USD), so this will give you $175 for every license sale."

While the fixed price of $250 can leave a lot of money on the table since images can license for fees in the thousands of dollars (as 500px also mentions in the FAQ), the payout of 70% is high, at least partially compensating. Hopefully the $250 is a teaser rate, which will be replaced by market prices once 500px Prime has attracted a critical mass of buyers.

NEW: Submit Your Photos Now To 500px Prime!
http://500px.com/blog/1101/new-submit-your-photos-now-to-500px-prime
#stockphotography   #photographybusiness  

Ne Photo Page Design on 500px

Google+: Reshared 17 times
Google+: View post on Google+

Comments

16 thoughts on “500px Releases Stock Photography Sales Functionality”

  1. I saw this a while back and said NO WAY will I license stuff for under $xxx.xx. We will see what happens. Either they will help kill the prices of licensing, or they will come around.

  2. +Jeff Sullivan I've had a couple of images invited, I'm curious to see how it develops. I didn't license all of them, I'm first trying out with two.
    On a related note, you may be interested in checking out  ImageBrief (http://www.imagebrief.com/r/a2PpqM), if you haven't yet. It's an interesting service that gives you access to briefs sent by buyers, and allows you to submit candidate images that you feel fit the client's requirements. You get 70% of the negotiated fee. I'm also trying it out. It  looks to me a much better approach (more focused) than just sending out photos to (micro) stock agencies…

  3. +J. Rae Chip I think they invited some people as a way to pre-load the website, before they launched the full service (as I understand it). I believe now you can submit directly. But it appears they are still actively recruiting members as well.

  4. The pricing is one thing, and 70% is a lot better than the 30% they originally announced – but my problem is the license itself.  While I favour RM over RF – even for RF this is a pretty broad license.  I don't think I want to give others the worldwide rights to resell or print my work for that licensing rate.

  5. +Daniel Schwabe I was referring to 500px, but I guess the 70% itself does refer to ImageBrief as well.  Very different licensing models as you point out.  While I haven't used any of 500px's services since last year, I do submit to ImageBrief when I have an image that is appropriate.

  6. +Michael Russell  In addition to $250 being an unnecessarily low price in many cases, the "forever" term could be a major concern.  The more I think about it, the less attractive it looks.  The stock photography market didn't need more downward pressure on prices or towards making terms less favorable to photographers.

    The 70% share of revenue benefits photographers only to the point where the lower $250 market price removes money from the sale.  For example with a sale which should generate a $600 price, 30% would be $180, roughly the same as the 70% of $250.  So for the slice of photos which would sell in the $250-600 range photographers do better than 30% of market price, but for sales at potential prices above that, it's not a great deal.  But that's still not a complete picture, since other agencies like Alamy are at 50%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...